Musicophilia: Dewey Decimal Number and Edition Guide
Oliver Sacks
Musicophilia: Tales of Music and the Brain has 781.11 in the selected Library of Congress record for Oliver Sacks’s first edition from Alfred A. Knopf, published in 2007. The selected ISBN is 9781400040810. Its subjects describe the psychological and physiological aspects of music. This is a useful classification example because the title crosses familiar boundaries: music, perception, memory, and neurological experience. The catalogue identifies a music-related treatment, while the edition details distinguish this first edition from a later paperback that was also checked.
Sources: [1]
The edition behind this number
Which musical experiences appear in the recorded contents?
The catalogue’s contents cover musical imagery, unusual pitch perception, memory, movement, emotion, and identity. They include topics such as absolute pitch and synesthesia alongside accounts concerned with music and memory. That range suggests several distinct reading questions rather than a single measure of musical ability. A reader interested in remembering a tune can inspect a different part of the book from a reader interested in the relationship between rhythm and movement. The contents help locate the inquiry; they do not establish that all these experiences have one explanation.
Sources: [1]
The author’s website gives contrasting examples: difficulties perceiving music, persistent musical experiences, and musical capacities that remain when other memory is severely affected. These examples make a single scale from unmusical to musical inadequate for planning a reading discussion. One account may concern what a person hears; another may concern what they can remember or perform. Choose the chapter according to that distinction. It is more informative to ask which capacity is being described than to treat every unusual musical experience as the same kind of gift or difficulty.
How can a reader distinguish an account from its interpretation?
The publisher’s reading guide describes a combination of personal stories, case histories, theories, and research. A productive reading note can keep those layers separate. Record what a person is described as experiencing, what interpretation Sacks offers, and what additional evidence the discussion supplies. That distinction preserves the interest of a narrative without requiring every striking story to prove a general proposition. It also gives a discussion group a way to disagree about an explanation while remaining attentive to the individual account that prompted it.
Sources: [3]
A particularly focused discussion can begin with the book’s memory material. The publisher’s guide draws attention to Clive Wearing and the relationship between severe amnesia, preserved musical abilities, and his personal life. Our suggested question is what would be lost if the account were reduced to a surprising memory test. Compare the details about performance with the details about relationships and everyday circumstances. That lets a group examine both the explanatory and biographical work of a case narrative, while keeping claims about this individual distinct from general claims about memory.
Sources: [3]
Why is this a useful comparison with a drawing book?
Drawing on the Right Side of the Brain has 741.2 in its selected fourth-edition record, with subjects for drawing technique and visual perception. Musicophilia has 781.11 and subjects describing music’s psychological and physiological aspects. Both therefore connect an art-related subject with perception, while addressing different activities and offering different forms of reading. A drawing manual can support a concrete representational task; a book of musical case narratives can support investigation of experience. A shared reference to the brain does not make the two publications interchangeable.
The comparison becomes more precise if a group asks what counts as an observation in each setting. A drawing exercise can leave a visible result to compare with the object being drawn. A musical case narrative describes someone’s experience and the observations reported about it. Those are different materials for discussion. Our proposed paired reading asks students to identify the evidence actually available in a passage or exercise, then state one question it leaves unanswered. This gives the perception connection a concrete educational use without suggesting that the books share a neurological theory.
Which edition supplies 781.11, and what was found for the paperback?
The source of the number is the 2007 first-edition print record. Its original classification is 781/.11, with Dewey edition 22 recorded separately. A second query checked paperback ISBN 9781400033539. That returned a 2008 Vintage record described as revised and expanded, but without a numeric 082 value. The two observations should stay separate. This page can report the first edition’s number and the paperback’s missing classification field without pretending that the latter was verified by copying a value from the former.
The later record is relevant to readers because its edition wording indicates that it is not merely an identical description with another binding label. If a reading group assigns a passage from the revised paperback, confirm that the available copy contains the intended material. The publisher’s online reading guide is useful for work-level discussion, but its paperback association does not change the edition that supplied the classification here. Preserve that distinction when combining a discussion resource with an independently identified catalogue record.
How can The Language Instinct extend a reading project?
The Language Instinct’s selected 1995 record has 400 and subjects for language and biolinguistics. It offers a related question about a human capacity without sharing Musicophilia’s music classification. The publisher’s Musicophilia reading guide also includes Pinker’s title among its suggested further reading. This provides a concrete basis for the connection. A reader can compare the questions being asked about music and language while recognising that neither a related-reading recommendation nor a thematic overlap establishes agreement between the authors’ explanations.
One route through that comparison begins with a song: words, remembered melody, emotional association, and the coordination of a performance are distinguishable questions. Locate a musical account that addresses one of them, then decide what additional question a book about language would need to answer. For instance, recognising a remembered tune is different from explaining the meaning of its words. This is our own comparison prompt, not a result attributed to either author. The recorded chapters on musical memory and speech provide a starting point for choosing passages with a clear purpose.
Sources for this edition guide
- Library of Congress: Musicophilia, first edition 2007006810
- Library of Congress: Musicophilia, revised paperback 2008279138
- Penguin Random House: Musicophilia reading guide
- Library of Congress: Drawing on the right side of the brain, LCCN 2012001232
- Library of Congress: The language instinct, LCCN 94039138
The record lists a valid ISBN associated with this edition. That does not independently verify every metadata field, establish a universal number for every version, or give the complete local shelf location. Compare the source with your copy.
Check current catalogue results ↗
Keep exploring
Learn how to read the number, view the ten-class chart, or read how sources and editions are handled.